Death Penalty in International Law
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1948, recognizes each person’s right to life. It categorically states that “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” (Article 5). In Amnesty International’s view, the death penalty violates these rights.
The community of states has adopted four international treaties specifically providing for the abolition of the death penalty. Through the years, several UN bodies discussed and adopted measures to support the call for the worldwide abolition of the death penalty. (Read more on the Amnesty International global website.)
Amnesty International opposes all executions. The United States continues to be one of the top five executioners in the world, despite the growing trend towards abolishing the death penalty and the serious concerns regarding racial bias and wrongful conviction connected with the practice.
The overwhelming majority of death row defendants in the US have been executed for killing white victims, even though African-Americans make up about half of all homicide victims. Almost all of these people could not afford their own attorney at trial, and since 1973, over 140 death row inmates have been exonerated due to evidence of wrongful conviction.
Group 11 is campaigning on the behalf of Reggie Clemons, whose case illustrates many of the flaws in the US death penalty system.
Reggie Clemons was sentenced to death in St. Louis as an accomplice to a 1991 murder of two young white women. Since his conviction, allegations have arisen of police coercion, prosecutorial misconduct, and a ‘stacked’ jury in the Clemons case. Yet inadequate legal representation at trial hampered appeal efforts, and a ruling overturning his death sentence was reversed on technical grounds.
Amnesty International continues to urge the state of Missouri to recognize the serious problems with Reggie Clemons’ case and to commute his death sentence.